Search for: All records

Recent years have seen a surge of interest in the community studying the effect of ultraviolet radiation environment, predominantly set by OB stars, on protoplanetary disc evolution and planet formation. This is important because a significant fraction of planetary systems, potentially including our own, formed in close proximity to OB stars. This is a rapidly developing field, with a broad range of observations across many regions recently obtained or recently scheduled. In this paper, stimulated by a series of workshops on the topic, we take stock of the current and upcoming observations. We discuss how the community can build on this recent success with future observations to make progress in answering the big questions of the field, with the broad goal of disentangling how external photoevaporation contributes to shaping the observed (exo)planet population. Both existing and future instruments offer numerous opportunities to make progress towards this goal. 

Abstract The Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC) hosts protoplanetary disks experiencing external photoevaporation by the cluster’s intense UV field. These “proplyds” are comprised of a disk surrounded by an ionization front. We present ALMA Band 3 (3.1 mm) continuum observations of 12 proplyds. Thermal emission from the dust disks and free–free emission from the ionization fronts are both detected, and the high-resolution (0.″057) of the observations allows us to spatially isolate these two components. The morphology is unique compared to images at shorter (sub)millimeter wavelengths, which only detect the disks, and images at longer centimeter wavelengths, which only detect the ionization fronts. The disks are small (r_d= 6.4–38 au), likely due to truncation by ongoing photoevaporation. They have low spectral indices (α≲ 2.1) measured between Bands 7 and 3, suggesting the dust emission is optically thick. They harbor tens of Earth masses of dust as computed from the millimeter flux using the standard method although their true masses may be larger due to the high optical depth. We derive their photoevaporative mass-loss rates in two ways: first, by invoking ionization equilibrium and second, by using the brightness of the free–free emission to compute the density of the outflow. We find decent agreement between these measurements and $\dot{M}$= 0.6–18.4 × 10⁻⁷M_⊙yr⁻¹. The photoevaporation timescales are generally shorter than the ∼1 Myr age of the ONC, underscoring the known “proplyd lifetime problem.” Disk masses that are underestimated due to being optically thick remains one explanation to ease this discrepancy.